Usage of Shanghai Scoring System for Predicting Ventricular Arrhythmic Events in Brugada Syndrome (BrS) Patients in Thailand

Authors

  • Kumpol Chintanavilas Chulabhorn International Collage of Medicine, Thammasat University
  • Nilubon Methachittiphan Ramathibodhi Hospital, 270 Rama VI Road, Rajataewe, Bangkok 10400 Thailand
  • Sirin Apiyasawat Ramathibodhi Hospital, 270 Rama VI Road, Rajataewe, Bangkok 10400 Thailand

Keywords:

Brugada syndrome, Shanghai scoring system, Risk stratification, Arrhythmic events

Abstract

Background: Many risk factors are associated with ventricular arrhythmic events in Brugada syndrome (BrS) patients. The Shanghai scoring system for diagnosis of BrS was initially published in 2015.1 A single study also validated using this scoring system for risk stratification of arrhythmic events in BrS patients.2 There has been no study to demonstrate the role of this scoring system in the risk stratification of BrS patients in the Thai population. This study aimed to evaluate the role of the Shanghai scoring system in predicting ventricular arrhythmic events in Thai BrS patients.

Method: We studied a retrospective cohort of BrS patients who were diagnosed from 1999 to 2019 at Ramathibodi Hospital. The patients were classified according to the Shanghai scoring system. All patients were followed for arrhythmic events and clinical outcomes.

Result: 54 Patients (14 with cardiac arrest, 30 with syncope, 3 agonal respirations, and 7 asymptomatic) were classified by the Shanghai score into group A (Very high risk); score 5.5 (n=34), group B (High risk); score 4-5 (n=14) and group C (Non-high risk); score 3.5 (n=6). During the follow-up period of 114 months, 11 arrhythmic events occurred (1 sudden cardiac arrest, 9 appropriate ICD therapy, 1 documented VT/VF from surface ECG). Incidence of ventricular arrhythmic events was highest in Group A (26.5%), followed by Group B (14.3%), and no event in Group C. Shanghai scores of more than 3.5 tend to be associated with increased ventricular arrhythmic events (HR 4.85, CI 0.037-630.2, p=0.525), compared to the lower risk group (Shanghai score 3.5). Five inappropriate ICD shocks occurred. Device-related complications occurred in 8 patients, with lead fracture being the most frequent complication (9.3%).

Conclusion: Risk stratification by the Shanghai scoring system may be useful in predicting ventricular arrhythmic events in Thai BrS patients. However, a larger cohort is needed for statistically significant results.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Antzelevitch C, Yan GX, Ackerman MJ, et al. J-wave syndromes expert consensus conference report: emerging concepts and gaps in knowledge. Heart Rhythm. 2016;13:e295-324.

Kawada S, Morita H, Antzelevitch C, et al. Shanghai Score System for Diagnosis of Brugada Syndrome: Validation of the Score System and System and Reclassification of the Patients. JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology. 2018;4(6):724-30.

Pranata R. Brugada syndrome: A brief review on diagnostic approach, risk stratification, and management. Int J Cardiovasc Acad. 2019;5:1-7.

Priori SG. Natural history of Brugada syndrome: insights for risk stratification and management. Circulation. 2002; 105: 1342-7.

Probst V, Veltmann C, Eckardt L, et al. Longterm prognosis of patients diagnosed with Brugada syndrome: results from the FINGER Brugada Syndrome Registry. Circulation. 2010;121:635-43.

Takagi M, Aonuma K, Sekiguchi Y, et al. The prognostic value of early repolarization (J wave) and ST-segment morphology after J wave in Brugada syndrome: multicenter study in Japan. Heart Rhythm. 2013; 10: 533-9.

Brugada J, Brugada P. Determinants of sudden cardiac death in individuals with the electrocardiographic pattern of Brugada syndrome. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2003; 26: 957.

Huang Z, Patel C, Li W, et al. Role of signalaveraged electrocardiograms in arrhythmic risk stratification of patients with Brugada syndrome: a pro-spective study. Heart Rhythm. 2009; 6: 1156-62.

Brugada J, Brugada R, Brugada P. Determinants of sudden cardiac death in individuals with the electrocardiographic pattern of Brugada syndrome and no previous cardiac arrest. Circulation. 2003; 108: 3092-6.

Makarawate P, Chaosuwannakit N, Vannaprasaht S. Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients with Brugada syndrome in north eastern Thailand. Singapore Med J. 2014; 55(4): 217-220.

Downloads

Published

2023-11-28

How to Cite

[1]
Chintanavilas, K., Methachittiphan, N. and Apiyasawat, S. 2023. Usage of Shanghai Scoring System for Predicting Ventricular Arrhythmic Events in Brugada Syndrome (BrS) Patients in Thailand. Asian Medical Journal and Alternative Medicine. 23, Supplemental (Nov. 2023), S20-S29.

Issue

Section

Original Articles