The Effectiveness of Mind Map as a Teaching Tool for Medical Students


  • Sidayu Suriya Master of Science Program (Health Science Education), Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
  • Nuntra Suwantarat Chulabhorn International College of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani, Thailand
  • Vorawan Vanicharoenchai Siriraj Health Science Education Excellence Center, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
  • Cherdsak Iramaneerat Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand



Mind map, Active Learning, Student engagement, Medical students


Objective: The mind map has been proven for improving learning effectiveness. We hypothesized that the mind map is helpful to enhance learning outcomes by increasing knowledge retention and student perception for 3rd year medical students at the Faculty of Medicine, Naresuan University.

Methods: A randomized controlled trial study was conducted by comparing the academic performance (MCQs scores for pre-test, immediate post-test, and delayed post-test) and the improvement in academic performance in each group by using the paired t test and the students’ perception survey (Assessing Student Perspective of Engagement in Class Tool, ASPECT) after attending the class of “osteoporosis” lecture with mind map (intervention group) and  lecture with slides (control group).

Results: Thirty-two students were enrolled, but only 28 students completed all the tests (n = 14 in each group). Both groups had no differences in age, gender, academic performance, or pre-test scores (mean of 3.36 in the intervention group vs. 3.34 in the control group). Both groups had similar increases in the immediate post-test score mean of 7.36 (intervention group) and 6.51 (control group) and the delayed post-test score mean of 6.07 (intervention group) and 6.00 (control group). Both groups’ post-test and delayed post-test scores increased significantly (P < .0001). There was a trend of higher ASPECT scores in the intervention group in the item “The instructor’s enthusiasm and class interesting” (P = .07).

Conclusions: The lecture with a mind map was effective in improving the academic performance of medical students by increasing students’ engagement and attention during the class.


Download data is not yet available.


Novak J. Concept mapping: A useful tool for science education. J Res Sci Teach. 1990;27:937-949.

Beitz J. Concept mapping. Nurse Educ. 1998;23:35-41.

Hoffman E, Trott J, Neely K. Concept mapping: a tool to bridge the disciplinary divide. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187:41-43.

Vacek J. Using a conceptual approach with concept mapping to promote critical thinking. J Nurs Educ. 2009;48:45-48.

Buzan T. Use your head. London: British Broadcasting Corporation; 1974.

Budd J. Mind maps As Classroom Exercises. J Econ Educ. 2004;35:35-46.

Eppler M. A Comparison between Concept Maps, Mind maps, Conceptual Diagrams, and Visual Metaphors as Complementary Tools

for Knowledge Construction and Sharing. Inf Vis. 2006;5:202-210.

Keles O. Elementary Teachers’ Views on Mind mapping. Inter J of Educ. 2012;4:93-100.

Mento A, Martinelli P, Jones R. Mind mapping in executive education: applications and outcomes. J Manag Dev. 1999;18:390-407.

D’Antoni A, Zipp G, Olson V, Cahill T. Does the Mind map learning strategy facilitate information retrieval and critical thinking in medical students? BMC Med Educ.2010;10(1).

Abraham S, Kalyanasundaram M, Ramachandran D, et al. Effectiveness of Mind mapping Technique in Information Retrieval Among Medical College Students in Puducherry-A Pilot Study. Indian J Community Med. 2017;42:19-23.

Harrison T, Jameson J. Harrison’s principles of internal medicine, 20th edition. New York: McGraw-Hill Education; 2018.

Wiggins B, Eddy S, Wener-Fligner L, et al. ASPECT: A Survey to Assess Student Perspective of Engagement in an Active-Learning Classroom. CBE- Life Sci Educ. 2017;16:32.

Minolin T. Mind mapping Vs traditional: A comparison of two instructional methods to teach Theories of Growth and Development

of children among B.Sc(N) III year students. Inter J Eng Res GenSci. 2015;3:327-330.

Farrand P, Hussain F, Hennessy E. The efficacy of the ‘Mind map’ study technique. Med Educ. 2002;36:426-431.

Wickramasinghe A, Widanapathirana N, Kuruppu O, Liyanage I, Karunathilake I. Effectiveness of Mind maps as a learning tool

for medical students. South-East Asian J Med Educ. 2008; Inaugural issue:30-32.

Al-Jarf R. Teaching Spelling Skills with a Mind-mapping Software. Asian EFL J. 2011;53:4-16.

Ravindranath S, Abrew W, Nadarajah V. Student’s perception of mind mapping in Problem-based learning. J Contemp Med Educ. 2016;4:60.

Mollberg N, Surati M, Demchuk C, et al. Mind-mapping for lung cancer: Towards a personalized therapeutics approach. Adv Ther. 2011;28:173-194.

Yeong F. Incorporating Mind-maps in Cell Biology Lectures - A Reflection on the Advantages and Potential Drawback. Procedia - Soc Behav Sci. 2013;103:485-491.

Dhindsa H, Makarimi-Kasim, Roger A. Constructivist-Visual Mind map Teaching Approach and the Quality of Students’ Cognitive Structures. J Sci Educand Tech. 2010;20:186-200.

Haji M. The Impact of Mind mapping Strategy on Vocabulary Use in the Writing of Iranian EFL Learners. In Program of the 2nd International Conference on New Trends in English Language Teaching and Testing; August 28,2017; Ardabil, Iran.

Atkinson R, Shiffrin R. Human Memory: A Proposed System and its Control Processes. Psychol Learn Motiv. 1968;2:89-195.

Baddeley A. Is working memory still working? Am Psycho. 2001;56:851-864.




How to Cite

Suriya, S., Suwantarat, N., Vanicharoenchai, V. and Iramaneerat, C. 2022. The Effectiveness of Mind Map as a Teaching Tool for Medical Students. Asian Medical Journal and Alternative Medicine. 22, 3 (Dec. 2022), 238–248. DOI:



Original Articles